About UsSubmit NewsContact UsRSS
  • CONTACT LENS HEADLINES HOME
    •  
  • CONTACT LENS TYPES
    • Colored Contacts
    • Costume Contacts
    • Disposable Contacts
    • Extended Wear Contacts
    • GP Contacts
    • Multifocal Contacts
    • New Contact Lenses
    • Silicone Hydrogel Contacts
    • Toric Contacts
  • SPECIAL TOPICS
    • Custom Contact Lenses
    • Hybrid Contact Lenses
    • Monovision
    • Orthokeratology
    • Specialty Contacts
    • Therapeutic Contacts
    • UV Protection
  • CONTACT LENS CARE
    • Contact Lens Care
    • Contact Lens Cases
    • Contact Lens Comfort
    • Contact Lens Complications
    • Contact Lens Wear
  • CONTACT LENS LAWS
    • Contact Lens Regulations
  • CONTACT LENS RESEARCH
    • Children & Contact Lenses
    • Research
  • RESOURCES
    • 10 Dos & Don'ts
    • 10 Myths About Contacts
    • 10 Reasons For Contacts
    • Cost of Contact Lenses

 
August 26, 2010

Study Identifies Risk Factors for Subconjunctival Hemorrhage Among Contact Lens Wearers

Subconjunctival hemorrhage

Subconjunctival hemorrhage.

The presence of pinguecula and loosening or excess growth of the conjunctiva are risk factors for the development of subconjunctival hemorrhage (SCH) among contact lens wearers, according to a study published online this month by the American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Researchers in Japan evaluated 45 contact lens wearers (ages 18 to 45) with SCH, 200 age-matched control subjects who did not wear contact lenses and 200 age-matched controls who wore contacts. Read more…

 
July 27, 2010

Optometrists Issue Joint Statement of Concern Regarding “Circle” Contact Lenses

In her recent music video, “Bad Romance,” pop star Lady Gaga’s appearance is more arresting than usual thanks to a bit of computer magic: Her eyes were digitally altered to appear bigger.

Not surprising, the doe-eyed look she has in the video has inspired a fad among many teenage girls and young women: wearing special color contacts that mimic the anime-style look. These so-called “circle” contacts have a darkly tinted zone that makes the wearer’s pupil look much larger than normal.

The problem is that circle contact lenses are being sold illegally via the Internet without a contact lens prescription, which eye doctors say could cause serious eye problems ranging from minor eye discomfort to serious eye infections, including potentially blinding infections such as Acanthamoeba keratitis. This especially is true when contact lenses are not properly cleaned and disinfected after each use and/or are shared among friends.

Today, the American Academy of Optometry (AAO) and American Optometric Association (AOA) issued a joint statement titled, “Concern Regarding Cosmetic ‘Circle’ Contact Lenses.”

In the document, the organizations point out that all contact lenses, whether they correct vision or are used simply for cosmetic purposes, are classified as medical devices by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and cannot be obtained legally in the United States without a prescription, which requires a contact lens fitting by a licensed eye care practitioner.

The joint statement also says studies show individuals who purchase contact lenses via the Internet or mail order have a four times greater risk of eye infections than those who purchase their lenses from an eye care professional.

The AAO and AOA also warn of the dangers of sharing or swapping contact lenses with friends and advise consumers desiring cosmetic contact lenses to alter or enhance their appearance to do so only after consultation with their eye care provider.

The AAO/AOA joint statement follows a similar warning about circle contacts issued earlier this month by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

 
July 19, 2010

Choosing the Best Contact Lens Replacement Frequency

Contact lens replacement scheduleSince disposable contacts were introduced in 1987, there has been plenty of controversy about how frequently you should replace your contacts to keep the lenses comfortable and your eyes healthy.

A consensus opinion doesn’t seem to exist among optometrists, as evidenced by a point-counterpoint discussion of the topic published in the June 2010 issue of Contact Lens Spectrum.

Colleen M. Riley, OD, vice president of professional development at Vistakon / Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, says disposable contact lenses should be replaced every two weeks for better vision, less contact lens discomfort and fewer complications.

Offering a different opinion, Peter D. Bergenske, OD, director of professional support at Ciba Vision North America, says popular and highly oxygen-permeable silicone hydrogel contact lenses make monthly replacement sufficient, and replacing contacts on a monthly basis is easier for contact lens wearers to remember than a two-week replacement schedule.


Other eye doctors prefer weekly replacement of disposable contacts. Weekly replacement is more likely to keep the lenses clear and comfortable, and a one-week replacement schedule is very easy for lens wearers to remember and comply with, they say.

Still other eye care practitioners say daily disposable contact lenses are the best choice. With daily disposables, there is no need to remember when to replace your contacts since they are discarded after a single use. Though daily disposable contacts may be the most costly option, many contact lens wearers prefer the convenience of not having to clean and disinfect their contacts at the end of the day, and there is no need to purchase lens care products.

So which contact lens replacement schedule is best for you? That may depend on your eyes as much as your personal preferences.

To determine the type of disposable contacts and the lens replacement schedule that are best for your needs, budget and lifestyle, it’s wise to discuss all options with your optometrist or ophthalmologist.

 
July 1, 2010

Smoking Increases Risk of Eye Inflammation and Contact Lens Discomfort

Rejecting cigaretteNeed another reason to quit smoking? How about because it might make your contact lenses feel better and decrease your risk of eye problems?

Researchers at Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, Ohio) recently fit 205 patients with CIBA Vision’s Night & Day silicone hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear and followed them for a period of one year. Read more…

 
October 22, 2009

Silicone Hydrogel Contacts Require Rub-and-Rinse Care, Expert Says

Silicone hydrogel contact lenses, even more than conventional soft contacts, require a rubbing step when cleaning and disinfecting the lenses with “no-rub” contact lens solutions, says a prominent contact lens specialist.

Michael A. Ward, MMSc, FAAO, instructor in ophthalmology at Emory University School of Medicine (Atlanta, Ga.) and director of Emory Eye Center‘s Contact Lens Service, says adding the manual cleaning step maximizes comfort, improves vision and reduces the risk of contact lens-related eye infections.

Researchers are finding that one-step (“no-rub”) contact lens solutions often do not completely remove environmental debris, skin oils and make-up from the surface of contact lenses. These lens deposits can cause eye discomfort and vision problems, and may also decrease the effectiveness of lens disinfectants and lead to serious problems, including bacterial and fungal eye infections and Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Silicone hydrogel lenses, which allow more oxygen to reach the cornea than regular soft contacts, are as likely as regular soft lenses to accumulate lens deposits if they are not properly cleaned and disinfected after each wearing period.

If patients at Emory Contact Lens Service are not compliant with a rub-and-rinse lens care regimen and lens deposits are noted, switching to a hydrogen peroxide-based lens care system often solves the problem, Ward told online newsletter Contact Lenses Today (Oct 22).

Another option for people who are prone to contact lens deposits or fail to care for their lenses properly is to switch to daily disposable contacts, which are designed to be discarded after a single use.

 
September 9, 2009

Doctors Debate Best Contact Lens Care System

What is the best method for cleaning and disinfecting your contact lenses?

In a recent issue of Contact Lens Spectrum, two prominent researchers addressed this issue in a point-counterpoint debate.

Charlotte Joslin, OD, PhD, epidemiologist and assistant professor of ophthalmology and visual sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago, prefers hydrogen peroxide-based contact lens solutions. She says that a recent study found that only a two-step hydrogen peroxide lens care system was effective against a microorganism that can cause a serious eye infection called acanthamoeba keratitis.

In addition to being proven effective against Acanthamoeba organisms, two-step hydrogen peroxide-based (HPB) contact lens care solutions also are the most effective against bacterial and fungal eye infections, according to Dr. Joslin. She also said that there have been two worldwide recalls of (non-hydrogen peroxide) multipurpose contact lens solutions due to outbreaks of amoeba and fungal eye infections associated with the use of these one-step solutions.

Dr. Joslin’s argument was countered by Craig A. Woods, PhD, research manager at the Centre for Contact Lens Research, School of Optometry, University of Waterloo (Ontario, Canada).

Dr Woods believes multipurpose contact lens care solutions offer the best combination of safety, cost and effectiveness.

He says that one-step (“no rub”) multipurpose solutions are less expensive and easier to use than HPB disinfecting solutions, and contact lens wearers are more likely to use them properly. He says that there have been “only rare reports” of complications associated with multipurpose solutions, and that they are proven safe and effective.

Dr. Woods also says that hydrogen peroxide-based lens care systems require contacts to be exposed to the hydrogen peroxide solution for a significant amount of time, and that single-step HPB systems may not allow sufficient time for complete disinfection.

He says that while the recent outbreaks of eye infections that caused global recalls of certain multipurpose care solutions were “horrendous for the individuals involved,” he believes these were isolated incidents and not representative of the overall performance of multipurpose disinfecting solutions.

The full point-counterpoint discussion of contact lens care solutions featuring Drs. Joslin and Woods appears in the June 2009 issue of Contact Lens Spectrum.

 
August 28, 2009

Peptide-Containing Contacts May Reduce Risk of Contact Lens-Related Eye Infections

Soon there may be a novel way to reduce the risk of contact lens-related eye infections: antibacterial contact lenses.

Researchers in Australia have discovered that incorporating melimine, a cationic peptide, into the the lens material of silicone hydrogel contact lenses reduced the incidence of contact lens induced acute red eye (CLARE) and contact lens induced peripheral corneal ulcers (CLPU) in rabbit and guinea pig eyes fit with contact lenses and exposed to common infection-causing bacteria.

Peptides are naturally occurring organic molecule formed by the linking of two to 50 amino acids. (Larger sequences of amino acids are called proteins.)

Cationic peptides range in size from 12 to 50 amino acids and have a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, including protection from bacteria, viruses and fungi. “Cationic” refers to the positive charge of the molecules, which enables them to interact with and affect negatively charged bacterial membranes.

The researchers concluded that incorporating the cationic peptide melimine into contact lenses may prevent the growth of bacteria on contacts and reduce the incidence and severity of contact lens-related eye infections.

Additional studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this approach and the feasibility of commercially developing such lenses.

Source: In vivo performance of melimine as an antimicrobial coating for contact lenses in models of CLARE and CLPU. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. (Published online ahead of print August 26, 2009.)

 
August 5, 2009

Rinsing Contact Lenses Improves Protein Removal

Rinsing silicone hydrogel contact lenses with an approved contact lens solution after removing them from the eye removes more than half the protein that accumulates on the lenses, according to a new study.

Researchers at The Ohio State University College of Optometry found that rinsing silicone hydrogel contacts thoroughly as part of a “no rub” lens care system removes protein deposits from the lenses significantly better than foregoing the rinse step.

Subjects participating in the study were fit with silicone hydrogel lenses manufactured by CIBA Vision and then wore the lenses on a daily wear basis for five days. They were instructed to use Aquify Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution (CIBA Vision) after each day of wear, following the manufacturer’s “no rub” care instructions.

The study participants then returned to the clinic and their lenses were removed by a gloved examiner. One lens was rinsed with the contact lens care solution and the other was not. Protein was then chemically removed from all lenses and quantified.

More than 50 percent more protein was chemically extracted from the lenses that did not undergo the rinse step after removal from the eye.

The results of the study suggest silicone hydrogel lenses have significantly less protein build-up if they are thoroughly rinsed with a multi-purpose contact lens care solution when removed from the eye. Including this rinse step as part of a “no rub” care system therefore may decrease the risk of contact lens discomfort and contact lens-related eye infections.

A full report of the study appears in the August 2009 issue of Optometry and Vision Science.

 
July 20, 2009

Types and Prevalence of Contact Lens Complications Identified

Researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) recently performed an analysis of the types and prevalence of contact lens-related complications among patients seen in the university’s clinic.

Of the 846 eyes of 572 contact lens wearers evaluated in the study, approximately 50 percent of eyes had at least one contact lens-related complication, the researchers said. Among the findings of the study:

  • Rigid gas permeable contacts had a statistically lower average number of complications than soft contact lenses.
  • Conjunctival papillae and giant papillary conjunctivitis were the most prevalent complications among both gas permeable (GP) and soft contact lens wearers.
  • Silicone hydrogel contact lenses had a slightly lower (though not statistically significant) rate of complications than regular soft lenses.
  • Extended wear contacts had a slightly higher complication rate compared with daily wear lenses.
  • Use of contact lens solutions not recommended by the wearer’s eye doctor — including generic and private label solutions — was associated with the highest rate of complications for both GP and soft contact lenses.

Conjunctival papillae are bumpy lesions on the inner surface of the eyelids that can affect contact lens comfort. Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) is an allergic inflammation of these papillae characterized by redness, itching and contact lens intolerance.

The researchers said the significant prevalence of contact lens-related complications identified by this study — regardless of lens design, material and wearing schedule — highlights the importance of routine professional eye care for all contact lens wearers.

The full report of the study appears in the July 2009 issue of Eye & Contact Lens: Science and Clinical Practice.

 
Newer Articles »


  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Get Shareaholic


 
© 2000-2012 Access Media Group LLC.